LLMResponse MP.L2-3.8.3.a

To effectively assess whether "system media containing FCI is sanitized or destroyed before disposal" as per your objective "[a]," you'll want to consider both the most appropriate evidence types and prioritizing assessment approaches.

Evidence Types Supported by Assessment Objects

1. **Artifacts (I1):**

  - *Media Sanitization Records:* These are direct records of media sanitization activities, demonstrating that specific actions were taken.
  

2. **Document (I2):**

  - *System Media Protection Policy:* This document outlines the policy and procedures for handling media containing FCI.
  - *Procedures Addressing Media Sanitization and Disposal:* Detailed documents showing how the organization implements its sanitization policies.

3. **Physical Review (I3):**

  - Direct observation of physical storage devices, ensuring they are destroyed or sanitized appropriately before disposal can serve as compelling evidence.

4. **Screen Share (I4):**

  - While less common for this objective, a screen share showing software tools used to sanitize media could be useful if applicable.

Prioritization of Assessment Approaches

1. **Examine:**

  - This approach is prioritized first because it provides tangible documentation and records such as policies, procedures, and sanitization logs that directly support the evidence needed for objective "[a]." 

2. **Interview:**

  - Interviewing personnel with media sanitization responsibilities can provide context and additional assurance regarding how policies are implemented in practice.

3. **Test:**

  - Testing organizational processes may be less critical initially but could serve as a follow-up to validate findings from documentation review and interviews, ensuring that procedures work as intended during actual disposal scenarios.

Summary

For assessing the sanitization or destruction of system media containing FCI before disposal:

- Prioritize gathering artifacts (e.g., sanitization records) and documents (policies/procedures). - Start with examining existing policies and records to understand formal processes. - Follow up with interviews for context on policy implementation. - Use testing if additional verification is needed, focusing on specific cases or anomalies identified during examination and interview phases.

This structured approach ensures a comprehensive assessment aligned with both the requirement and available evidence types.