LLMResponse MA.L2-3.7.4.a
- Analyzing Evidence Collection for CMMC MA.L2-3.7.4 Media Inspection
Based on the information provided, I'll help you rank evidence types and prioritize assessment approaches for the assessment objective regarding checking media containing diagnostic and test programs for malicious code.
Evidence Type Ranking
For this specific assessment objective, here's how I would rank the evidence types:
1. **Screen Share (I4)** - This would provide the most direct evidence by allowing you to observe the actual scanning process in real-time, showing how staff check media for malicious code before use.
2. **Artifacts (I1)** - These would include logs from anti-virus/anti-malware scans showing the scanning of diagnostic and test programs, possibly hash verification reports, and documented results of these checks.
3. **Documents (I2)** - Formal procedures for handling diagnostic and test media, security policies specifying scanning requirements, and documentation of the scanning process.
4. **Physical Review (I3)** - While useful, this would be less direct than the other methods for this particular objective, as the scanning process is largely digital.
Assessment Approach Prioritization
1. **Test (C3)** - This should be your highest priority approach. By testing the actual process of inspecting media for malicious code, you can directly verify that:
- The scanning mechanisms function as intended - Staff know how to properly scan media - Hash verification tools are properly utilized - Proper procedures are followed when malicious code is detected
2. **Interview (C2)** - After testing, conduct interviews with:
- IT staff responsible for system maintenance - Personnel handling external media - Information security personnel These interviews will help confirm their understanding of procedures and responsibilities for media inspection.
3. **Examine (C1)** - While still valuable, examining documentation should be your third priority. Review:
- System maintenance policy with specific sections on media inspection - Procedures for scanning external media - Logs showing scans of diagnostic media - Incident reports for any detected malicious code on maintenance media
Practical Implementation Recommendations
To effectively demonstrate compliance, I recommend:
1. Conduct a live demonstration (Screen Share) of your media scanning process with an actual diagnostic tool or test program from a vendor.
2. Collect and maintain scan logs (Artifacts) showing that media containing diagnostic and test programs are checked before use.
3. Document clear procedures (Documents) for this specific process, including:
- What tools are used for scanning - Steps for hash verification when available - What to do if malicious code is detected - Who is responsible for performing these checks
4. Implement a procedure to verify any hashes provided by vendors against downloaded files.
These evidence collection strategies will provide comprehensive proof that your organization meets the assessment objective of checking media containing diagnostic and test programs for malicious code before they are used in systems that process, store, or transmit CUI.