LLMResponse CM.L2-3.4.5.d

From CMMC Toolkit Wiki
Revision as of 21:41, 6 April 2025 by David (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I'll help you assess each objective for CM.L2-3.4.5 (Access Restrictions for Change) and prioritize the assessment approaches and evidence types for each objective. Assessment Objective [d]: Physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced == Evidence Types Ranking: === 1. **Physical Review**: Most valuable - directly observe enforcement mechanisms 2. **Artifacts**: Strong - access logs, badge records 3. **Screen Share**: Useful - view mo...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'll help you assess each objective for CM.L2-3.4.5 (Access Restrictions for Change) and prioritize the assessment approaches and evidence types for each objective.

Assessment Objective [d]: Physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced

Evidence Types Ranking: =

1. **Physical Review**: Most valuable - directly observe enforcement mechanisms 2. **Artifacts**: Strong - access logs, badge records 3. **Screen Share**: Useful - view monitoring systems 4. **Documents**: Supporting - enforcement procedures

Assessment Approach Priority:

1. **Test**: Most important for enforcement verification

  - Test physical access control mechanisms
  - Verify badge systems, biometric controls work as intended
  

2. **Physical Review**: Critical complementary approach

  - Observe physical barriers (locks, gates)
  - Check escort procedures for visitors
  

3. **Examine**: Supportive

  - Review access logs and security violation reports
  - Check badge access records for appropriate restrictions

Each assessment objective requires a tailored approach with different emphasis on assessment methods and evidence types. The key is to ensure comprehensive coverage while focusing on the most relevant and efficient approaches for each specific objective.