LLMResponse CM.L2-3.4.5.h: Difference between revisions

From CMMC Toolkit Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Created page with "I'll help you assess each objective for CM.L2-3.4.5 (Access Restrictions for Change) and prioritize the assessment approaches and evidence types for each objective. Assessment Objective [h]: Logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced == Evidence Types Ranking: == 1. **Screen Share**: Most valuable - direct observation of enforcement 2. **Artifacts**: Strong - system logs, access attempt records 3. **Documents**: Supporting - enforcem..."
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I'll help you assess each objective for CM.L2-3.4.5 (Access Restrictions for Change) and prioritize the assessment approaches and evidence types for each objective.
Assessment for Objective [h]: Logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced


Assessment Objective [h]: Logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced
== Evidence Types Ranking (Most to Least Valuable) ==


== Evidence Types Ranking: ==
1. **Screen Share**: Most valuable evidence
1. **Screen Share**: Most valuable - direct observation of enforcement
  - Direct observation of access controls in action
2. **Artifacts**: Strong - system logs, access attempt records
  - Live demonstration of permission enforcement
3. **Documents**: Supporting - enforcement procedures
  - Real-time verification of access restriction functioning
4. **Physical Review**: Limited value for logical controls
  - Visual confirmation of denied access attempts


== Assessment Approach Priority: ==
2. **Artifacts**: Strong supporting evidence
1. **Test**: Most important
  - System logs showing access attempts and denials
   - Test access control mechanisms
  - Audit trails of configuration changes
   - Try to perform changes with insufficient privileges
  - Security incident reports related to access violations
  - Event logs showing enforcement of restrictions
 
3. **Documents**: Supporting but less conclusive
  - Enforcement procedures
  - Records of access controls
  - Security violation documentation
  - System configuration verification records
 
4. **Physical Review**: Limited value for logical enforcement
  - Generally not applicable for logical access controls
  - Might observe some aspects of workstation controls
 
== Assessment Approach Priority ==
 
1. **Test** (Primary approach)
   - Test access control mechanisms directly
   - Attempt to perform changes with insufficient privileges
   - Verify system prevents unauthorized changes
   - Verify system prevents unauthorized changes
    
   - Confirm role-based access controls function properly
2. **Screen Share**: Critical complement
  - Validate that system enforces separation of duties
 
2. **Screen Share** (Critical complement)
   - Observe login attempts with different privilege levels
   - Observe login attempts with different privilege levels
   - Watch application of access controls in real-time
   - Watch application of access controls in real-time
    
   - See how the system responds to unauthorized attempts
3. **Examine**: Important support
  - Verify enforcement of access restrictions visually
 
3. **Examine** (Important supporting approach)
   - Review system logs showing denied access attempts
   - Review system logs showing denied access attempts
   - Check audit trails of configuration changes
   - Check audit trails of configuration changes
  - Verify incident reports related to access violations
  - Examine enforcement records and monitoring data


Each assessment objective requires a tailored approach with different emphasis on assessment methods and evidence types. The key is to ensure comprehensive coverage while focusing on the most relevant and efficient approaches for each specific objective.
For this enforcement objective, prioritize testing actual controls to verify that defined logical access restrictions are properly implemented and functioning. Screen sharing provides critical visual evidence of enforcement, while examination of logs and records offers supporting evidence of consistent enforcement over time.

Latest revision as of 22:27, 6 April 2025

Assessment for Objective [h]: Logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced

Evidence Types Ranking (Most to Least Valuable)

1. **Screen Share**: Most valuable evidence 

  - Direct observation of access controls in action
  - Live demonstration of permission enforcement
  - Real-time verification of access restriction functioning
  - Visual confirmation of denied access attempts

2. **Artifacts**: Strong supporting evidence 

  - System logs showing access attempts and denials
  - Audit trails of configuration changes
  - Security incident reports related to access violations
  - Event logs showing enforcement of restrictions

3. **Documents**: Supporting but less conclusive 

  - Enforcement procedures
  - Records of access controls
  - Security violation documentation
  - System configuration verification records

4. **Physical Review**: Limited value for logical enforcement 

  - Generally not applicable for logical access controls
  - Might observe some aspects of workstation controls

Assessment Approach Priority

1. **Test** (Primary approach) 

  - Test access control mechanisms directly
  - Attempt to perform changes with insufficient privileges
  - Verify system prevents unauthorized changes
  - Confirm role-based access controls function properly
  - Validate that system enforces separation of duties

2. **Screen Share** (Critical complement) 

  - Observe login attempts with different privilege levels
  - Watch application of access controls in real-time
  - See how the system responds to unauthorized attempts
  - Verify enforcement of access restrictions visually

3. **Examine** (Important supporting approach) 

  - Review system logs showing denied access attempts
  - Check audit trails of configuration changes
  - Verify incident reports related to access violations
  - Examine enforcement records and monitoring data

For this enforcement objective, prioritize testing actual controls to verify that defined logical access restrictions are properly implemented and functioning. Screen sharing provides critical visual evidence of enforcement, while examination of logs and records offers supporting evidence of consistent enforcement over time.

Retrieved from "https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_CM.L2-3.4.5.h&oldid=1486"