LLMResponse CM.L2-3.4.5.c: Difference between revisions

From CMMC Toolkit Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "I'll help you assess each objective for CM.L2-3.4.5 (Access Restrictions for Change) and prioritize the assessment approaches and evidence types for each objective. Assessment Objective [c]: Physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are approved == Evidence Types Ranking: == 1. **Documents**: Primary - approval signatures, authorization forms 2. **Artifacts**: Strong supporting - approval records, authorization databases 3. **Screen Share**: Us..."
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:40, 6 April 2025

I'll help you assess each objective for CM.L2-3.4.5 (Access Restrictions for Change) and prioritize the assessment approaches and evidence types for each objective.

Assessment Objective [c]: Physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are approved

Evidence Types Ranking:

1. **Documents**: Primary - approval signatures, authorization forms 2. **Artifacts**: Strong supporting - approval records, authorization databases 3. **Screen Share**: Useful to view approval workflows 4. **Physical Review**: Limited value

Assessment Approach Priority:

1. **Examine**: Most effective

  - Check for physical access approvals, authorization signatures
  - Review approval workflows in change management systems
  

2. **Interview**: Important complement

  - Talk with approval authorities and security administrators
  - Understand approval chains and authorization processes
  

3. **Test**: Limited relevance

  - Testing approval processes might be disruptive

Each assessment objective requires a tailored approach with different emphasis on assessment methods and evidence types. The key is to ensure comprehensive coverage while focusing on the most relevant and efficient approaches for each specific objective.