<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LLMResponse_MP.L2-3.8.2.a</id>
	<title>LLMResponse MP.L2-3.8.2.a - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LLMResponse_MP.L2-3.8.2.a"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_MP.L2-3.8.2.a&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-21T07:15:07Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_MP.L2-3.8.2.a&amp;diff=1523&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>David: Created page with &quot;To assess whether &quot;access to CUI on system media is limited to authorized users&quot; under MP.L2-3.8.2, you need a strategic plan involving different assessment approaches and corresponding evidence types. Here&#039;s a prioritized approach:  == Prioritization of Assessment Approaches ==  1. **Examine (C1)**:    - **Why prioritize?** Examining documents provides concrete evidence that procedures exist to limit access.    - **Potential Evidence Types**:       - Document: Review th...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_MP.L2-3.8.2.a&amp;diff=1523&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-04-07T02:37:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;To assess whether &amp;quot;access to CUI on system media is limited to authorized users&amp;quot; under MP.L2-3.8.2, you need a strategic plan involving different assessment approaches and corresponding evidence types. Here&amp;#039;s a prioritized approach:  == Prioritization of Assessment Approaches ==  1. **Examine (C1)**:    - **Why prioritize?** Examining documents provides concrete evidence that procedures exist to limit access.    - **Potential Evidence Types**:       - Document: Review th...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;To assess whether &amp;quot;access to CUI on system media is limited to authorized users&amp;quot; under MP.L2-3.8.2, you need a strategic plan involving different assessment approaches and corresponding evidence types. Here&amp;#039;s a prioritized approach:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prioritization of Assessment Approaches ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. **Examine (C1)**:&lt;br /&gt;
   - **Why prioritize?** Examining documents provides concrete evidence that procedures exist to limit access.&lt;br /&gt;
   - **Potential Evidence Types**: &lt;br /&gt;
     - Document: Review the system media protection policy, access control policies and procedures, and any records related to user authorization lists. These artifacts provide tangible proof of existing controls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. **Interview (C2)**:&lt;br /&gt;
   - **Why prioritize?** Interviews can validate that documented processes are understood by personnel responsible for implementing them.&lt;br /&gt;
   - **Potential Evidence Types**: &lt;br /&gt;
     - Artifacts: Gather statements or confirmations from personnel with system media protection and information security responsibilities about who is authorized to access CUI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. **Test (C3)**:&lt;br /&gt;
   - **Why prioritize?** Testing ensures that the documented policies are actively enforced in practice.&lt;br /&gt;
   - **Potential Evidence Types**: &lt;br /&gt;
     - Physical Review: Conduct observations of secure storage areas or controlled environments where system media is stored, and verify whether only authorized personnel have access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ranking of Evidence Types ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. **Document (I2)**:&lt;br /&gt;
   - Highest priority as it provides a direct record of policies and procedures related to authorizing user access to CUI on system media.&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
2. **Artifacts (I1)**:&lt;br /&gt;
   - Important for supporting evidence from interviews, including authorization lists or logs confirming who is permitted access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. **Physical Review (I3)**:&lt;br /&gt;
   - Offers practical validation that physical controls are in place and effectively implemented during storage and handling of CUI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. **Screen Share (I4)**:&lt;br /&gt;
   - Useful but secondary to the above methods; it can demonstrate live procedures for checking out media or verifying access permissions, providing real-time evidence of process adherence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implementation Steps ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Start with a thorough examination of documents related to policies on system media protection and authorized user lists.&lt;br /&gt;
- Conduct interviews with key personnel responsible for these areas to ensure comprehension and correct application of the documented processes.&lt;br /&gt;
- Perform tests by conducting physical reviews or observations where CUI is stored, ensuring that access controls are properly enforced in practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By following this prioritized approach, you&amp;#039;ll be able to effectively gather evidence demonstrating compliance with MP.L2-3.8.2&amp;#039;s requirement to limit CUI access on system media to authorized users.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>David</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>