<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LLMResponse_MA.L2-3.7.5.a</id>
	<title>LLMResponse MA.L2-3.7.5.a - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LLMResponse_MA.L2-3.7.5.a"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_MA.L2-3.7.5.a&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-21T07:17:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_MA.L2-3.7.5.a&amp;diff=1385&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>David: Created page with &quot;I&#039;ll analyze the best approach for assessing objective [a] of CMMC practice MA.L2-3.7.5, which requires multifactor authentication for establishing nonlocal maintenance sessions via external network connections.  == Ranking of Evidence Types ==  For this specific assessment objective, here&#039;s how I would rank the evidence types:  1. **Screen Share (I4)** - This provides the strongest real-time evidence as you can directly observe the multifactor authentication process in...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_MA.L2-3.7.5.a&amp;diff=1385&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-04-02T04:39:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;ll analyze the best approach for assessing objective [a] of CMMC practice MA.L2-3.7.5, which requires multifactor authentication for establishing nonlocal maintenance sessions via external network connections.  == Ranking of Evidence Types ==  For this specific assessment objective, here&amp;#039;s how I would rank the evidence types:  1. **Screen Share (I4)** - This provides the strongest real-time evidence as you can directly observe the multifactor authentication process in...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I&amp;#039;ll analyze the best approach for assessing objective [a] of CMMC practice MA.L2-3.7.5, which requires multifactor authentication for establishing nonlocal maintenance sessions via external network connections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ranking of Evidence Types ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this specific assessment objective, here&amp;#039;s how I would rank the evidence types:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. **Screen Share (I4)** - This provides the strongest real-time evidence as you can directly observe the multifactor authentication process in action during nonlocal maintenance sessions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. **Artifacts (I1)** - These would include logs showing multifactor authentication challenges and successful responses during nonlocal maintenance sessions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. **Physical Review (I3)** - On-premise observation of the multifactor authentication setup and configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. **Documents (I2)** - Written policies, procedures, and configurations for nonlocal maintenance sessions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Prioritization of Assessment Approaches ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For obtaining the evidence for assessment objective [a], I recommend prioritizing the approaches as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. **Test (C3)** - This should be your primary approach as it provides direct evidence of the functionality. You can observe and test the multifactor authentication process in real-time by:&lt;br /&gt;
   - Initiating a nonlocal maintenance session&lt;br /&gt;
   - Verifying both authentication factors are required&lt;br /&gt;
   - Confirming access is only granted after both factors are validated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. **Examine (C1)** - This supports the test evidence by reviewing:&lt;br /&gt;
   - System configuration settings showing MFA requirements for nonlocal maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
   - Logs of past nonlocal maintenance sessions showing MFA challenges and responses&lt;br /&gt;
   - Documentation of MFA implementation specific to maintenance activities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. **Interview (C2)** - This provides supporting context by:&lt;br /&gt;
   - Discussing with system administrators how MFA is implemented for nonlocal maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
   - Confirming the processes with security personnel&lt;br /&gt;
   - Validating the knowledge of procedures among maintenance staff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key Assessment Objects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the prioritized approaches, focus on these specific assessment objects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**Test:**&lt;br /&gt;
- Mechanisms for strong authentication of nonlocal maintenance diagnostic sessions&lt;br /&gt;
- Actual implementation of MFA during connection attempts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**Examine:**&lt;br /&gt;
- System configuration settings showing MFA requirements&lt;br /&gt;
- Maintenance logs showing MFA challenges&lt;br /&gt;
- System security plan sections detailing nonlocal maintenance authentication requirements&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**Interview:**&lt;br /&gt;
- Personnel with system maintenance responsibilities&lt;br /&gt;
- Network administrators who configure the authentication systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comprehensive approach will provide robust evidence of compliance with the multifactor authentication requirement for nonlocal maintenance sessions.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>David</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>