<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LLMResponse_CM.L2-3.4.1.a</id>
	<title>LLMResponse CM.L2-3.4.1.a - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=LLMResponse_CM.L2-3.4.1.a"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_CM.L2-3.4.1.a&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-21T07:17:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_CM.L2-3.4.1.a&amp;diff=1431&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>David: Created page with &quot;I&#039;ll help you prioritize both assessment approaches and evidence types for evaluating assessment objective &quot;[a] a baseline configuration is established&quot; within the CM.L2-3.4.1 practice.  == Priority of Assessment Approaches ==  Based on the CMMC Assessment Guide information provided, I recommend prioritizing the three assessment approaches as follows:  1. **Examine (highest priority)** - This should be your primary approach because baseline configurations are primarily d...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cmmcwiki.org/index.php?title=LLMResponse_CM.L2-3.4.1.a&amp;diff=1431&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-04-06T01:25:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;ll help you prioritize both assessment approaches and evidence types for evaluating assessment objective &amp;quot;[a] a baseline configuration is established&amp;quot; within the CM.L2-3.4.1 practice.  == Priority of Assessment Approaches ==  Based on the CMMC Assessment Guide information provided, I recommend prioritizing the three assessment approaches as follows:  1. **Examine (highest priority)** - This should be your primary approach because baseline configurations are primarily d...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I&amp;#039;ll help you prioritize both assessment approaches and evidence types for evaluating assessment objective &amp;quot;[a] a baseline configuration is established&amp;quot; within the CM.L2-3.4.1 practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Priority of Assessment Approaches ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the CMMC Assessment Guide information provided, I recommend prioritizing the three assessment approaches as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. **Examine (highest priority)** - This should be your primary approach because baseline configurations are primarily documented artifacts. Examining documentation of the established baseline configuration provides direct evidence of compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. **Interview (medium priority)** - Interviews with personnel responsible for configuration management can verify understanding of and adherence to the baseline configuration, as well as provide context about how it was established.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. **Test (supportive priority)** - Testing can verify that the baseline configuration is actually implemented, but it&amp;#039;s most valuable after you&amp;#039;ve established what the baseline configuration should be through examination and interviews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ranking of Evidence Types ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For assessment objective &amp;quot;[a] a baseline configuration is established,&amp;quot; I would rank the evidence types as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. **Documents (highest value)** - Documentation of the established baseline configuration is the most direct evidence. This would include configuration management documentation, system security plans, and formal baseline specifications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. **Artifacts (high value)** - Tangible records showing the baseline configuration has been established, such as configuration files, system images, or automated deployment scripts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. **Screen Share (medium value)** - Observing configuration management systems or tools showing the established baseline can be valuable supplementary evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. **Physical Review (lower value)** - While this could verify physical aspects of the configuration (hardware components), it&amp;#039;s less critical for establishing that a baseline configuration exists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key Assessment Objects to Focus On ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When collecting evidence for &amp;quot;[a] a baseline configuration is established,&amp;quot; prioritize these assessment objects:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration management policy that mandates baseline configurations&lt;br /&gt;
- Documentation describing the baseline configuration &lt;br /&gt;
- System security plan sections related to baseline configurations&lt;br /&gt;
- Configuration management plan&lt;br /&gt;
- System architecture and configuration documentation&lt;br /&gt;
- System configuration settings and associated documentation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember that the assessment objective is specifically about establishing a baseline configuration—not necessarily maintaining it over time (which is addressed in objective [c]). Your evidence should focus on showing that a formal, documented baseline exists as a point of reference for your systems.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>David</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>