David: Created page with "Based on your document, I'll help you prioritize evidence types for assessing objective [a] under the AC.L2-3.1.2 practice "Transaction & Function Control." This objective aims to determine if "the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute are defined." For this specific assessment objective, I recommend prioritizing the evidence types in the following order: 1. Artifacts - Highest priority - Documentation defining user r..."

2025-04-30T01:56:02Z

Created page with "Based on your document, I'll help you prioritize evidence types for assessing objective [a] under the AC.L2-3.1.2 practice "Transaction & Function Control." This objective aims to determine if "the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute are defined." For this specific assessment objective, I recommend prioritizing the evidence types in the following order: 1. **Artifacts** - Highest priority - Documentation defining user r..."

New page

Based on your document, I'll help you prioritize evidence types for assessing objective [a] under the AC.L2-3.1.2 practice "Transaction & Function Control." This objective aims to determine if "the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute are defined."

For this specific assessment objective, I recommend prioritizing the evidence types in the following order:

1. **Artifacts** - Highest priority
- Documentation defining user roles and permitted functions (access control matrices)
- Role descriptions specifying allowed transaction types
- System configuration settings showing access restrictions
- Technical implementation of access control lists

2. **Documents** - Second priority
- Access control policies
- System security plan sections addressing function control
- Procedure documentation for transaction authorization
- User guides explaining permitted actions by role

3. **Screen Share** - Third priority
- Demonstration of how system access controls are configured
- View of actual permissions implementations in systems
- Verification of how permissions are assigned to roles

4. **Physical Review** - Lowest priority
- Observation of transaction controls in actual operation
- Review of physical access controls related to function restrictions

Regarding assessment approaches, I recommend the following prioritization:

1. **Examine** - Most important
- Review access control policy documentation
- Check system design documents showing how transactions are controlled
- Look at configuration settings implementing these controls

2. **Interview** - Second priority
- Speak with system administrators who implement the controls
- Talk to security personnel who design access restrictions
- Interview staff who understand how transactions are limited

3. **Test** - Third priority
- Verify mechanisms are actually working as documented
- Confirm access control policy implementation

This prioritization puts documentation-based evidence first because defining transaction types is primarily a documentation activity. The examine approach is most important since this objective specifically focuses on whether these transaction types are defined, rather than how well they're implemented.

LLMResponse AC.L2-3.1.2.a - Revision history